A full-length documentary by Sacha Stone exposes the 5G existential threat to humanity in a way we never imagined possible! How much 5G harms living creatures.

Secrets exposed within this podcast are troubling. It shows that the capitalist as a choke hold on all people’s rights to be free from such harms. Good for profits, but bad for people and the vanishing species of the world.

The psychopathic inner workings of governments and big business allowed for these harmful effects. The development of 5G has left out two important parts, science and public safety.

Health concerns:

It shows how these low frequency microwaves can damage the human micro biome causing Autism and cancer. And, if this can cause such damage in humans, imagine what it doing to other species. The birds quickly fly away from this 5G exposure. This maybe useful to shoo birds from their execution by way of windmill blades. Fragile creatures are more vulnerable than humans.

Harmful effects are kept secret. Because, 5G is not easily detectable. This will drive already expensive health care even higher. What kind of think tank could have envisioned such harmful effects to human health. Like putting micro plastics in American chewing gum that can harm ones thyroid. Capitalism again runs amok. Ordinary people have to make a stand. Check their control.

Many communities have fought against 5G in their neighborhoods and have won. Those are the neighborhoods that are the safest and most desirable. Where birds live alongside nature. Where your life is not threaten by something invisible causing you harm. It invades your space without you knowing about it. Telecommunication industry received immunity from the government from such harm.

Victims live with degraded health. Sounds like Long Covid, another intensively complex condition that requires a fortune to treat. What will they throw at us next?

Rain water is now unsafe to drink because of the proliferation of man-made chemicals. PFOS, forever chemicals have contaminated the planet. Ignoring the science and public safety is killing us. If rain water is unsafe for humans what is it doing to all the species of the world. This is their only means of water and it is unfiltered from these forever chemicals. Is it causing a mass extinction? Are they not dying off at accelerated rate? I think the answer is clear.

Please SHARE this as widely as you feel drawn…use it to target your local bureaucrats, technocrats, health practitioners, local and federal government agencies and more than anything else…your family and friends.

Featuring in this film: weapons development experts, biologists, molecular & cellular biologists, blood microscopists, activists, as well as good leaders out there on the front line. We know what this technology is. We know how it was conceived. And, we know where it is intended to take people and planet. We are drawing the line here…and we are doing so with the full fire of consciousness. Arise Homo sapiens!

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative.

Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from the enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

This World Bridge and utilities highway will connect five continents. Imagine being able to drive to almost everywhere there are roads. A high-speed railway system will transport goods and people. Fresh water, oil, gas, minerals, fiber-optic and power pipelines will move through this new land based route.

Tourism would increase leading to a greater understanding of the world. Maybe even, bring peace and end wars. Imagine a world where Russia, China and the United States all help for the greater good of all the people and species, while improving economies and environments around the world.

Imagine pristine oceans with thriving sea life in abundance. What a difference, now that we’re transporting goods and people more efficiently using hydrogen powered high speed transports.  This reduces shipping cost and the pollution from the oceans to our airways. Why fly and waste those fossil fuels when you can get there faster on this new high speed rail system fueled by pollution free “hydrogen”. The World Bridge system will take you almost anywhere fast, if you let it. People will want to migrate there, just for a job and the adventure in pristine forested lands fresh water and a new start in life.

summitbridge.com.

With hydrogen fuel the supplies are endless and the cost are low. Water is the by-product of hydrogen we can use more of that. Once, we use it to fuel our airlines and vehicles our harmful air pollution are reduced significantly. Our World Bridge can change the world for the better with faster, cleaner nonpolluting transportation that will also boost our hydrologic cycle from the hydrogen by product water.

The World Bridge is where the East bridges the West. It is more than just bridge building, it's also roads and infrastructure that just continues to grow from two directions Russia and the USA. Probably the biggest project ever. This would create growth to surrounding countries like Canada China etc. This would be a win-win for everyone. Branches would sprout in both directions from the World Bridge the latest greatest attraction it will make.

Hydrologic Cycle (via NASA)

https://wisdomvision.com/ideal-fix/

The water, or hydrologic, cycle describes the pilgrimage of water as water molecules make their way from the Earth’s surface to the atmosphere and back again, in some cases to below the surface. This gigantic system, powered by energy from the Sun, is a continuous exchange of moisture between the oceans, the atmosphere, and the land.

https://heshydrogen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/hydrologic-cycle.jpg

Hydrogen… It’s Renewable

Gasoline… It’s Non-Renewable

Cost of Hydrogen $1Source: WaterSupply: InfiniteRenewable: YesCarbon Footprint: NoCost per gallon: $1.00 – 1.80kg (gge)Source cost: $1.50 per 1000/gal. or $0.0015/gallon2Refinery Costs: $700 – $3,500/bpdMiles per kg of Hydrogen: 81Additional Environmental Impact Costs: No

Foot Notes:1. Hydrogen is measured by the kilogram. 1 kilogram is 1 gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge).

2. $0.0015/gallon + $0.987/kg (gge) Refining Costs = $0.9885 = $1.00/kg (gge) using Atmospheric Electrolyses.$0.0015/gallon + $1.80/kg (gge) Refining Costs =$1.8015 = $1.80/kg (gge) using Compressed Electrolyses.NOTE: It takes 3 gallons of water to make 1 kg of hydrogen, 1 gallon of water = 0.38 kg of hydrogen, roughly a 3:1 ratio. Therefore: 1000 gallons of water ÷ 3 = (produces) 333 kg of H2÷ 50 gallons per drum = 6.66 “barrels of H2” per 1000 gallons of water. That is equivalent to a 7:1 H2 to crude oil ratio.Energy needed to make 1 kg of H2 = 32.9 kWh/kg. using atmospheric electrolyses.Off peak rate of $0.03/kw x 32.9 kWh = $0.987/kg.Energy needed to make 1 kg of H2 = 60 kWh/kg using compressed electrolyses.Off peak rate of $0.03/kw x60 kWh = $1.80

Cost of GasolineSource: Crude OilSupply: FiniteRenewable: NoCarbon Footprint: YesCost per gallon: $2.321Source Cost: $101.14/barrel2 or $1.98/gallonRefinery Costs: $1,000 – $5,000/bpdMiles per Gallon of Gasoline: 18 – 31Additional Environmental Impact Costs: Yes

Foot Notes:1. NOTE: Based on the national average of one (1) gallon of gasoline at retail of $3.35/gal. reported on 1/6/12.59% of cost is Crude Oil or $3.35 x 59% = $1.98/gallon. 10% of cost is Refining Costs or $3.35 x 10% = $0.34/gallon. Refining Costs & Crude$1.98 + $0.34 = $2.32 per Gallon2. NOTE: The actual cost of a barrel of Crude Oil at 2:25 p.m. EST on 1/6/12 was $101.14/barrel)2. The components of the retail price of gasoline are: Crude Oil Price (59%), Federal & State Taxes (20%), Refining Costs (10%), Distribution & Marketing (11%)

Sources:American Water Works AssociationUnited States Department of EnergyEnergy Information Administration (EIA), Washington D.C.National Hydrogen AssociationU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA)

Declaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707

A New York Times Bestseller

In Requiem for the American Dream, his first major book on the subject of income inequality,Noam Chomsky sharply criticizes the fundamental tenets of Neo-liberalism and casts a sober eye on the economic facts of life. He identifies ten principles of concentration of wealth and power at work in America today. Chomsky devotes a chapter to each of these ten principles, and adds readings from some of the core texts that have influenced his thinking to bolster his argument. His thesis: This “vicious circle” of measures has led to a corrosion of democracy and thus destroyed step by step the basis of the American Dream.

About the Author

Noam Chomsky (born 1928) is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, political activist, and social critic. He vocally opposed U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, believing the war to be an act of American imperialism. In 1967, he attracted widespread public attention for his antiwar essay “The Responsibility of Intellectuals”. Associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism.

His works range from the study of linguistics and the development of language to the causes of war and the condition of democracies around the world. In 2016, the documentary Requiem for the American Dream was released, summarizing his views on capitalism and economic inequality through a “75-minute teach-in” (Daniel Gold in the New York Times). Requiem for the American Dream was published as a book in 2017 by Seven Stories Press.

Noam Chomsky Life and works Bibliography and filmography 

The Book (2017)

In the introductory chapter to the book, Chomsky explains how in a democracy, public opinion is supposed to influence government policy but more often than not doesn’t. He attributes this to the influence of the privileged and powerful who have never liked democracy. Chomsky sums up the threat to democracy thus: Concentration of wealth yields concentration of power. The cost of elections skyrockets, which forces political parties even more deeply into the pockets of major corporations. This political power quickly translates into legislation that increases the concentration of wealth.

So fiscal policy, like tax policy, deregulation, rules of corporate governance, and a whole variety of measures designed to increase the concentration of wealth and power yields more political power to do the same thing. And, that’s what we’ve been seeing. So we have this kind of “vicious cycle” in progress.”

The Making of Film and Book

Film and book are the result of a collaboration between author and the film crew. To create Requiem for the American Dream, Chomsky and his editors, the filmmakers Peter Hutchison, Kelly Nyks, and Jared P. Scott, spent countless hours together over the course of five years, from 2011 to 2016. After the release of the film version, Chomsky and the editors returned to the many hours of tape and transcript and created a document that included three times as much text as was used in the film.

The Ten Principles of Concentration of Wealth and Power

Principle #1: Reduce Democracy

Right through American history, there’s been an ongoing clash between pressure for more freedom and democracy coming from below, and efforts at elite control and domination coming from above. It goes back to the founding of the country.

James Madison, the main framer of the Constitution, who was as much of a believer in democracy as anybody in the world in that day, nevertheless felt that the United States system should be designed, and indeed with his initiative was designed, so that power should be in the hands of the wealth. Because the wealthy were believed to be the more responsible set of men.

Principle #2: Shape Ideology

Beginning in the 1970s there was a business offensive to try to beat back the egalitarian efforts that went right through the Nixon years. Chomsky: You see it in many respects, over on the right, you see it in things like the famous Powell Memorandum, a “corporate blueprint to dominate democracy.”  The elite was appalled by the democratizing tendencies of the ’60s, and thought we have to react to it. They were concerned that there was an “excess of democracy” developing.

Principle #3: Redesign the Economy

Since the 1970s, there’s been a concerted effort on the part of “the masters of mankind”, the owners of the society, to shift the economy in two crucial respects. There was first a huge increase in the flows of speculative capital, a shift  from traditional banks to risky investments, complex financial instruments, money manipulations and so on. In the 70s General Electrics could make more profit playing games with money than they could by producing in the United States. That’s a phenomenon that’s called financialization of the economy. Going along with that is the off-shoring of production.

The trade system was reconstructed that it put working people in competition with one another all over the world. When testified to congress Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, explained his success in running the economy as based on what he called, “greater worker insecurity.” Keep workers insecure, they’re going to be under control. They are not going to ask for decent wages or decent working conditions or the opportunity of free association, meaning unionize. These two processes, financialization and off-shoring are part of what lead to the vicious cycle of concentration of wealth and concentration of power.

Principle #4: Shift the Burden

The American Dream, like many ideals, was partly symbolic, partly real. In the 1950s and 60s there was the biggest growth period in American economic history: The Golden Age. It was a pretty egalitarian growth, the lowest fifth of the population benefited as well as the upper fifth. And there were some welfare state measures, which improved life for a large part of the population.

Taxes on the wealthy were far higher,  corporate taxes were much higher, taxes on dividends were much higher, taxes on wealth were much higher. The tax system was redesigned so that the taxes that had to be paid by the very wealthy were reduced and, correspondingly, the tax burden on the rest of the population’s increased. The major American corporations shifted the burden of sustaining the society onto the rest of the population.

Principle #5: Attack Solidarity

Solidarity is dangerous. From the point of view of the “masters”, you’re supposed to care about yourself, not about other people. Adam Smith based his whole approach to the economy on the principle that sympathy is a fundamental human trait, but it was driven out of people’s heads. Today we see it in policy formation, for example in the attack on social security. Social security is based on a principle of solidarity. Social security means, “I pay payroll taxes, so that the widow across town can get something to live on.” Chomsky: If you want to destroy some system: first de-fund it. We also see it in the attack on public schools. Public schools are also based on the principle of solidarity.

Principle #6: Run the Regulators

Chomsky: If you look over the history of regulation, say, railroad regulation, financial regulation and so on, you find that quite commonly it’s either initiated by the economic concentrations that are being regulated, or it’s supported by them. And the reason is because they know that, sooner or later, they can take over the regulators. And it ends up with what’s called “regulatory capture.” The business being regulated is in fact running the regulators.

Principle #7: Engineer Elections

Concentration of wealth yields concentration of political power, particularly so as the cost of elections skyrockets, which forces the political parties into the pockets of major corporations. Chomsky: The 14th amendment has a provision that says, “no person’s rights can be infringed without due process of law.” And the intent was to protect freed slaves. I don’t think it’s ever been used for freed slaves, if ever, marginally. Almost immediately, it was used for businesses, corporations. Their rights can’t be infringed without due process of law. So they gradually became persons under the law.

Corporations are state-created legal fictions. Maybe they’re good, maybe they’re bad, but to call them persons is outrageous. Undocumented foreigners who are living here and building your houses, cleaning your lawns, and so on, they’re not persons. Moreover, in the 1970s, the courts decided that money is a form of speech. It means that corporations, which have been pretty much buying elections, are now free to do it with virtually no constraint. That’s a tremendous attack on the residue of democracy. It’s an incredible decision, and it puts the country in a position where business power is greatly extended beyond what it always was. This is part of that vicious cycle

Principle #8: Keep the Rabble in Line

There is one organized force which traditionally, with all its flaws, had been in the forefront of efforts to improve the lives of the general population. That’s organized labor. It’s a barrier to corporate tyranny. A major reason for the concentrated, almost fanatic attack on unions, on organized labor, is that they are a democratizing force. They provide a barrier that defends workers’ rights, but also popular rights generally. That interferes with the prerogatives and power of those who own and manage the society.

The U.S. has a long and very violent labor history as compared with comparable societies. The labor movement had been very strong. By the 1920s, in a period not unlike today, it was virtually crushed. By now, less than 7% of private sector workers have unions. The effect is that the usual counter-force to an offensive by our highly class-conscious business class has dissolved.

Principle #9: Manufacture Consent

The public relations industry, the advertising industry, is dedicated to creating consumers, it’s a phenomena that developed in the freest countries, in Britain and the United States, and the reason is clear. It became clear, a century ago, that it was not easy to control the population by force. Too much freedom had been won. So, other means of controlling people had to be found. It was understood and expressed that you have to control people by controlling their beliefs and attitudes, what  the great political economist Thorstein Veblen called “fabricating consumers.”

Principle #10: Marginalize the Population

Martin Gilens, professor of politics at Princeton University, came out with a study of the relation between public attitudes and public policy. What he shows is that about 70% of the population has no way of influencing policy, and that the population knows it. What it’s led to is a population that is angry, frustrated, hates institutions. It’s taking the form of unfocused anger, attacks on one another and on vulnerable targets. Chomsky: One place you see it strikingly is on April 15th. April 15th is kind of a measure, the day you pay your taxes (In the United States is Tax Day).

If a society is really democratic, April 15th would be a day of celebration. It would be a day when the population gets together, decides to fund the programs and activities that they have formulated and agreed upon. I don’t think we’re smart enough to design, in any detail, what a perfectly just and free society would be like. I think we can give some guidelines and, more significant, we can ask how we can progress in that direction.

John Dewey, the leading social philosopher in the late 20th century, argued that until all institutions, production, commerce, media, are all under participatory democratic control we will not have a functioning democratic society.

Conclusion

“In the age of faltering democracies, Noam Chomsky is more relevant than ever” (Rohit Kumar). Chomsky’s merits: He identifies anti-democratic tendencies in the US in 10 concise points. But although the entire length of book and the film is dedicated to the discussion of the many destabilizing tendencies, hope shines through. Because ultimately Chomsky is an optimist. This shows in the beginning:

“During the Great Depression, which I’m old enough to remember, it was bad–much worse subjectively than today. But there was a sense that we’ll get out of this somehow, an expectation that things were going to get better .” And it also shows in the Howard Zinn- quote at the end:

“What really matters are the countless small deeds of unknown people who lay the basis for the events of human history. These are the people who have made change in the past; they are responsible for making change in the future, too.” The concentration of wealth is unsustainable.

References

“Requiem for the American Dream.” Movie Script.

Goodman, Amy. “Noam Chomsky in Conversation with Amy Goodman on Trump, Nukes, North Korea, Climate Change & Syria”. Democracy Now (Dec. 25, 2017).

Kelly, Geoff. “Noam Chomsky, Requiem, The Film”. Daily Public(Mar. 29, 2016).

Kumar, Rohit. “In the Age of Faltering Democracies, Noam Chomsky Is More Relevant Than Ever” The Wire.

Declaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707

A capital capture of democracy. Deep state led false flag events to boost the industrial war machine into the future. Anytime, one has to borrow, the banks win. Could they have had something to do with it? We live in a world of their choosing. Are they the root of all misery?

Oct. 7, 2023 is a repeat. The IDF and CIA were informed a year prior with golden intelligence. Long enough to devise this horrific outcome for Palestinians and the world. This war cuts off their life support. Than makes their land uninhabitable. Propaganda and censorship in the first AI war is meticulously working as planned.

Since 1917, Balfour this fulfills the Zionist wish. With the largest world media empire, Council on Foreign Relations behind them, it is easier than ever. They only had to sacrifice the innocent left. A dream-like scenario for the wicked and the wickedly wealthy.

Michael Ruppert -

Little did we know at the time, 9/11 was not a normal day of blue sky aviation. On the contrary, it was one of the busiest days in the history of American aviation, a dense forest of live fly exercises, drills, simulations, fake radar injects and utter confusion. And that was before the attacks even began. This is the story of 9/11 that you didn’t watch unfold on your TV that fateful day in 2001. This is the story of the 9/11 War Games.

TRANSCRIPT

When we remember the events of 9/11, we are often invited to reflect on how the attack came out of the clear, blue sky. Until the terror began to unfold in real time on everyone’s television screen, it was just another beautiful, blue sky day, a perfect day for aviation.

CNN ANCHOR: It is 8 AM in Salisbury, North Carolina, 7:00 a.m. in Chicago, 5:00 a.m. in Calaveras County, California, where the news is being made on this Tuesday, September 11th.

CNN ANCHOR 2: From CNN…

MATT LAUER: Anyway, that’s all coming up. 8:01 let’s get to the top news stories of the morning. For that we turn to Anne Curry.

ANN CURRY: Because now we have a camera. Katy, Matt and Al, thank you so much this morning. Good morning, everybody, again.

SARAH FERGUSON: …but isn’t in America, in politics, isn’t spinning…What is spinning, Charlie?

CHARLIE GIBSON: Well, spinning is getting out your point of view, trying to put your interpretation on something.

FERGUSON: So do you think there is a lot of spinning done in politics…

FOX ANCHOR: …Miss America pageant, but this year things are different. Contestants will be quizzed on current events, US history and government. 10 of the 51 contestants got a preview. Among the questions: Naming the current vice president, and knowing what happened December 7th, 1941. Two contestants didn’t know Dick Cheney was the vice president and four missed the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

EARLY SHOW: Miles and miles of sunshine. Miles Davis. Going to put Miles out there today. Nice as it could be across the Northeast. Rough seas still from from the chop from that hurricane, but other than that it’s kind of quiet around the country. We like quiet. It’s quiet. It’s too quiet.

SOURCE: “It’s Too Quiet” The Early Morning Television of 9/11/2001

But that was merely the public’s impression of the events from ground level. Little did we know at the time, 9/11 was not a normal day of blue sky aviation. On the contrary, it was one of the busiest days in the history of American aviation, a dense forest of live fly exercises, drills, simulations, fake radar injects and utter confusion. And that was before the attacks even began.

This is the story of 9/11 that you didn’t watch unfold on your TV that fateful day in 2001. This is the story of the 9/11 War Games.

PART ONE – WAR GAMES

It only stands to reason that government employees, armed forces and first responders spend a considerable amount of time every year training to respond to crises. A major, catastrophic event may only happen once in a lifetime, but if and when it does occur, the appropriate personnel need to know how to respond.

Not all military exercises and government drills are the same, however. These training events can range all the way from computer simulations and war games—where no personnel are deployed and no physical resources are committed—to live field exercises where real people use real equipment and even real munitions to practice responding to real-world emergencies or simulate real warfare.  And as these drills and exercises move from abstract models to real-life exercises, the line between reality and simulation can become blurry.

What does it mean, then, when a simulation of an emergency takes place at the exact same place and time as that real emergency is happening in real life?

PETER POWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company—bearing in mind I’m now in the private sector—and we sat everybody down in the City. A thousand people involved in the whole organization, but the crisis team. And the most peculiar thing was we based our scenario on the simultaneous attacks on that underground and mainline station so we had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real.

INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this scenario?

POWER: Almost precisely.

SOURCE: Peter Power 7/7 Terror Rehearsal

In the hours after the July 7th, 2005 bombings in London, Peter Power gave a series of interviews to various outlets confirming that he had been running an exercise at the exact time of the attack. That exercise envisioned bombs going off at Liverpool Street, King’s Cross, and Russell Square at exactly the same time as real bombs were going off at those very locations.

PETER POWER: At half past 9 this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.

HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWER: Precisely.

SOURCE: Peter Power 7/7 Terror Rehearsal

What are we to make of this? Is this just a remarkable coincidence? Proof of the the keen insight of advisors like Peter Power in correctly predicting the locations and times of likely terror attacks? Or something altogether different? And, if this was set up by some intelligence agency or someone with advance knowledge of the real attack, what would be the point? Why would they bother to schedule a drill “rehearsing the event” at the same time as the event itself?

Just as there are various kinds of drills, war games and exercises, so, too, are there different ways that such simulations could be used to help facilitate an actual event. A drill could be used to distract security services and hinder responses, for example, thus helping an attack to succeed. Or the exercise could act as an alibi in case the plot is discovered before it can take place. Or, in an even more chilling scenario, a war game or training event could be used to recruit patsies who, believing they are only taking part in an exercise, unwittingly move people or equipment into place for a real attack.

KIMMY: Yes! I am the king! Numero uno, baby. Mmmm mmmm.

(The Gunmen walk over to Kimmy.)

BYERS: Find something?

KIMMY: Yep. I wound up in some government think-tank’s upload directory. Here’s your scenarios, ladies.

BYERS: It’s in clear. Counter-terrorism scenarios. War games developed for the Defense Department.

FROHIKE: What’s Scenario 12-D?

(Kimmy clicks on the file. A dialog box on the screen opens.)

FILE INFOscenario_12D.txtDomestic Airline In-Flight Terrorist Act

LANGLY: Airline terrorism? That doesn’t make sense. Your father was murdered over a war game?

BYERS: Download it.

SOURCE: 9/11 X-Files – The Lone Gunmen Pilot (Predictive Programming)

Incredibly, the plot of the pilot episode of “The Lone Gunmen,” a spin-off of the popular X-Files television program, aired in March 2001, depicted a scenario in which a group of government insiders piggy-backed on a military war game involving a hijacked airplane to remote control a civilian passenger jet into the World Trade Center.

BYERS SNR: What the hell are you doing? Why can’t you stay out of this. Leave me buried.

BYERS: What is scenario 12-D?

(BYERS SNR doesn’t respond.)

BYERS: We know it’s a war game scenario. That it has to do with airline counter-terrorism. Why is it important enough to kill for.

BYERS SNR: Because it’s no longer a game.

BYERS: But if some terrorist group wants to act out this scenario, then why target you for assassination?

BYERS SNR: Depends on who your terrorists are.

BYERS: The men who conceived of it the first place. You’re saying our government is planning to commit a terrorist act against a domestic airline?

BYERS SNR: There you go again. Blaming the entire government as usual. In fact, a small faction …

BYERS: For what possible gain?

BYERS SNR: The Cold War’s over, John. But with no clear enemy to stockpile against, the arms market’s flat. But bring down a fully loaded 727 into the middle of New York City and you’ll find a dozen tinpot dictators all over the world just clamoring to take responsibility, and begging to be smart-bombed.

But as outlandish as this idea seems to those not immersed in military history or strategy, the idea of a war game “going live” is not limited to the world of fiction. In fact, it is a real and openly-acknowledged secret among military planners that such exercises can be used as an operational cover for a real attack. Reflecting on lessons learned from his tenure as Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, Casper Weinberger observed that “the difference between a realistic exercise or maneuver and what could be preparations for an attack, that line is sometimes quite blurred.”

And Weinberger should know. It was under his watch that a “fictional” war game scenario brought the world to the brink of a very real global thermonuclear war.

In 1983, at the height of Cold War tensions over the Reagan Administration’s moves to increase the US nuclear arsenal and his national security directive calling for the ability to win a nuclear war, NATO decided to simulate a first-strike nuclear attack on the Soviet Union in an exercise dubbed “Able Archer 83.” As recently declassified documents show, the exercise was unprecedented in its scale and scope, even involving a very real radio-silent air lift of 19,000 US troops to Europe. So realistic was the build up of forces and the preparations for nuclear strikes during these “war games” that, as we now know from these documents kept hidden from the public for 30 years, Able Archer 83 very nearly caused a real nuclear exchange.

But these concerns about war games going live did not end with the break up of the Soviet Union. On September 10, 2001, the Russian Air Force began a week-long training exercise over the North Atlantic, Pacific, and Arctic Oceans. The exercise simulated a Russian bombing attack in response to NATO aggression. On September 9, 2001, NORAD announced they would be deploying additional fighter aircraft to Forward Operating Locations in Alaska and Northern Canada to monitor the exercise and “ensure that our air sovereignty is maintained.” The Russians called off their war game when the 9/11 attacks began to unfold.

Military planners know that simulations and war games can be used as cover for real attacks. But what about 9/11? Were there any exercises, simulations or drills that had a bearing on what was happening on that fateful day?

PART TWO – PREPARATIONS

In the wake of 9/11, the Bush Administration’s mantra became that no one could have imagined such an attack before it took place.

REPORTER: Why shouldn’t this be seen as an intelligence failure, that you were unable to predict something happening here?

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Steve, I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile.

SOURCE: Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice, May 16, 2002

DONALD RUMSFELD: First, I must say, I know of no intelligence during the roughly six plus months leading up to September 11 th that indicated terrorists intended to hijack commercial airliners and fly them into the Pentagon or the World Trade Towers. If we had had such information, we could have acted on it.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission: Defense

GEORGE W. BUSH: Nobody in our government, at least, and I don’t think the prior government, could envision flying airplanes into buildings on such a massive scale.

SOURCE: President Addresses the Nation in Prime Time Press Conference, April 13, 2004But, like everything else the Bush Administration told the public about 9/11, this, too, was a lie. Not only had government officials “envisioned flying airplanes into buildings” or “using an airplane as a missile,” but multiple agencies trained for just such an event prior to 9/11. In fact, as General Richard Myers—Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2001 to 2005—went on to tell the 9/11 Commission, this precise scenario of a hijacked jet being flown into a high value target was drilled by NORAD not once or twice but five separate times in the run-up to September 11th.

On November 6th, 1999, they simulated an event in which terrorists hijacked a passenger jet flying out of JFK with the intention of crashing it into the United Nations building in New York.

On June 5th, 2000, they simulated two hijackings, one in which the terrorists intended to fly the plane into the Statue of Liberty, and the other in which the intended target was the White House.

An October 16th, 2000, NORAD drill saw a hijacker once again targeting the UN building, as did a nearly identical exercise on October 23rd of that year.

One of NORAD’s pre-9/11 hijack drills even saw the World Trade Center itself become the intended target.

Other exercises involved not just hijacked jets as weapons, but tested NORAD’s response to simultaneous hijackings being used in a coordinated attack on American airspace.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Well, obviously it would be hard to imagine posturing for the exact scenario. But isn’t it a fact, sir, that prior to September 11th, 2001, NORAD had already in the works plans to simulate in an exercise a simultaneous hijacking of two planes in the United States?GEN. MCKINLEY: Colonel Scott, do you have any data on that? I’m not aware of that, sir. I was not present at the time.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: That was Operation Amalgam Virgo.

SOURCE: Terrorist Attacks and Response

Amalgam Virgo is an annual NORAD field training exercise, meaning that real aircraft are deployed and actual personnel are used to “simulate” real-life situations.  The planning document for Amalgam Virgo 01, which took place in June 2001, featured a picture of Osama Bin Laden surrounded by airplanes. Amalgam Virgo 02, which was already in the planning stages on 9/11 and actually took place in June 2002, involved a simulated hijacking of a real Delta Airlines 757 by “military personnel acting as civilian passengers” and ran through multiple scenarios for stopping the plane from reaching its target, including a shoot down.

But as uncanny as these similarities are to real life events, declassified documents from the 9/11 Commission archive show that many other types of hijack scenarios were practiced in the three years before September 11th. These documents prove that many of the lies told about the “confused” response to the 9/11 attacks are just that: lies.

We have long been told, for instance, that NORAD wasn’t set up to deal with a domestic hijacking threat because the agency was solely focused on outward threats.

RICHARD MYERS: It’s the way that we were directed to posture, looking outward. Those were the orders that NORAD had and has had for — ever since the end of the Soviet Union when we had at that time I think it was 26 alert sites around the United States and we’d gone down to seven.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

But time after time between 1999 and 2001, NORAD simulated so-called “inside-inside” events, where domestic airliners bound for domestic destinations were hijacked en route. General Myers simply lied when he said that NORAD’s defenses were only directed toward outside threats. As these documents show, NORAD was actively engaged in modeling domestic terror threats, not only domestic civilian airliner hijackings but even one scenario, dubbed “Fertile Rice,” in which Osama bin Laden directed an attack on Washington using a drone aircraft laden with explosives.

And these were not the only pre-9/11 “training” events that bore a striking resemblance to the actual attacks. The specific scenario of a plane crashing into the Pentagon was drilled not just once or twice, but at least three separate times in the year prior to September 11th.

In October 2000, a Pentagon mass casualty exercise, or “MASCAL,” envisioned a scenario in which a passenger jet hit the Pentagon. Army medics, the Arlington Fire Department and other emergency responders participated in the drill.

In May 2001, another Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise tested responses to a passenger jet crashing into the Pentagon’s courtyard. This time, the tri-Service DiLorenzo Health Care Clinic and the Air Force Flight Medicine Clinic participated in the training. Lieutenant Colonel John Felicio, deputy commander for administration of the DiLorenzo Tricare Health Clinic, later remarked: “You know, it was kind of eerie. The scenario we had for these MASCALS was very similar to what actually happened. Our scenario for both MASCALS was a plane flying into the Pentagon courtyard.”

Then, in August 2001, just one month before 9/11, yet another Pentagon mass casualty exercise practiced building evacuation. As General Lance Lord, Commander of Air Force Space Command, later noted: “Purely a coincidence, the scenario for that exercise included a plane hitting the building.”

“Purely a coincidence.” Time after time after time after time after time in the months leading up to the attacks, military personnel and first responders were trained to respond to the very events that the public is asked to believe actually took place on the day of 9/11. Some of these training exercises even involved real aircraft being “pretend” hijacked by real military personnel “acting as civilian passengers.”

Purely a coincidence.

As we can see, the idea that no one could have predicted the attacks of September 11th is not just a lie, but an absurd lie. In fact, the sheer number of times those very scenarios were exercised before they took place by itself raises the question of what these war game planners knew about what was set to take place that day.

But as remarkable as all of these drills and exercises are, more remarkable still are the similarities between the events of 9/11 and the war games that we now know were taking place that very morning.

PART THREE – TRAINING DAY

Tuesday, September 11, 2001, dawns temperate and nearly cloudless in the eastern United States. A perfect day for aviation.

Meanwhile, all around the country, military personnel, first responders and government officials prepare for one of the busiest days of “simulated” terror in history.

In New York City, preparations continue for “Operation Tripod,” an exercise run by the New York City Office of Emergency Management involving hundreds of personnel from FEMA and other disaster response agencies. The exercise simulates a bioterrorist attack on New York, and on the morning of September 11th equipment is already in place at Pier 92—just four miles north-northwest of the Twin Towers—to treat the “victims” of this pretend attack.

RUDY GIULIANI: … on September 12th, Pier 92 was going to have a drill. It had hundreds of people here from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from the State Emergency Management Office and they were getting ready for a drill for a bio-chemical attack. So that was going to be the place they were going to have the drill, the equipment was already there.

SOURCE: 9/11 Commission Hearings May 19, 2004

And on the 97th floor of the South Tower of the World Trade Center, a team of technology consultants who have flown in from California for the occasion are running an emergency drill in the offices of Fiduciary Trust.

Meanwhile in Washington, members of the 12th Aviation Battalion, in charge of “aviation support for the White House, US government officials, Department of Defense, Department of the Army, and other government agencies” are two hours away from their base, participating in their annual weapons training.

12 miles south of the Pentagon, Fort Belvoir begins a garrison control exercise drilling the base on its response to a simulated terrorist attack.

Firefighters at Fort Myer, just 1.5 miles from the Pentagon, are sitting down for an “aircraft crash refresher class.”

Matthew Rosenberg—an Army medic at the DiLorenzo TRICARE Health Clinic—sits down in Corridor 8 of the Pentagon to “study a new medical emergency disaster plan based on the unlikely scenario of an airplane crashing into the place.”

And in Chantilly, Virginia—just four miles from the runway of Dulles Airport—the military and CIA personnel who staff the National Reconnaissance Office are beginning an exercise in which a plane crashes into their building.

Members of the Joint Special Operations Command (the US military’s “top counter terrorism unit”) are in Hungary preparing for “Jackal Cave,” a highly-classified joint readiness exercise.

Fighter pilots deployed to monitor the Russian Air Force’s training exercise in the Arctic are readying themselves for a day of maneuvers in Alaska and Northern Canada.

And at NORAD’s combat operations center at the Cheyenne Mountain Complex in Colorado, military commanders are preparing for one of the busiest days of war games and exercises in the history of the United States.

BARRIE ZWICKER: Michael Ruppert is standing by at his office in Sherman Oaks, California. Michael, thanks for this. What is the reason for the failure of US military jets to show up in a timely fashion on 9/11?

MICHAEL RUPPERT: Well, the simple fact is, Barrie, that they didn’t know where to go. The reason that they didn’t know where to go was because a number of conflicting and overlapping war game exercises were taking place, one of which, Northern Vigilance, had pulled a significant number of North American fighter aircraft into Canada and western Alaska and and northern Alaska in a mock Cold War hijack exercise. There was another drill, Vigilant Guardian, which was a hijack exercise, a command post exercise, but it involved the insertion of false radar blips on to radar screens in the NorthEast Air Defense Sector. In addition we have a confirmation thanks to General Richard Myers who was acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs who told Richard Clarke, as reported in Clarke’s book, that there was another exercise, Vigilant Warrior, which was, in fact, according to a NORAD source a live fly hijack drill being conducted at the same time.

With only eight available fighter aircraft, and they have to be dispatched in pairs, they were dealing with as many as 22 possible hijacks on the day of 9/11 and they couldn’t separate the war game exercises from the actual hijacks.

SOURCE: The Great Deception

Yes, on the morning of September 11, 2001, the stage was perfectly set for an unprecedented day of simulated terror throughout the northeastern United States.

And then it all happened for real.

PART FOUR – THIS IS NOT AN EXERCISE

08:37:52

BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.

POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?

BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

Confusion.

08:52:40

NASYPANY: This is what I got. Possible news that a 737 just hit the World Trade Center. This is a real-world. And we’re trying to confirm this. Okay. Continue taking the fighters down to the New York City area, J.F.K. area, if you can. Make sure that the F.A.A. clears it— your route all the way through. Do what we gotta do, okay? Let’s press with this. It looks like this guy could have hit the World Trade Center.

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

Chaos.

09:49

HERNDON CENTER: Ah, do we wanna think about, ah, scrambling aircraft?

FAA HEADQUARTERS: Ah, (sighs) oh God, I don’t know.

HERNDON: Uh, that’s a decision someone is gonna have to make probably in the next 10 minutes.

FAA HQ: Uh, you know everybody just left the room.

SOURCE: Rutgers Law Review

Paralysis.

There are many ways to describe the FAA, DoD and NORAD response to the events of 9/11. But given that, according to the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, not a single fighter jet was able to intercept a single hijacked airliner between the first hijacking report at 8:20 AM and Flight 93’s downing nearly two hours later at 10:03 AM, the claim that the response to these events was actually enhanced by the war games and exercises taking place that morning is downright absurd.

REP. CYNTHIA MCKINNEY: The question was we had four war games going on on September 11th, and the question that I tried to pose before the secretary had to go to lunch was whether or not activities of the four war games going on on September 11th actually impaired our ability to respond to the attacks.

GEN. RICHARD MYERS: The answer to the question is no, it did not impair our response. In fact, General Eberhart, who was in the command of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission, I believe—I believe—he told them that it enhanced our ability to respond, given that NORAD didn’t have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day. That was an FAA responsibility.

SOURCE: Fiscal Year 2006 Defense Budget

MR. ROEMER: General Eberhart, a question about our training posture on the day of 9/11. On page five of our Staff Statement, the FAA says at 8:38 in the morning, “Hi, Boston Center, TMU, we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York and we need you guys to — we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there. Help us out.” NEADS says, “Is this real world or an exercise?”

My question is, you were postured for an exercise against the former Soviet Union. Did that help or hurt? Did that help in terms of were more people prepared? Did you have more people ready? Were more fighters fueled with more fuel? Or did this hurt in terms of people thinking, “No, there’s no possibility that this is real world; we’re engaged in an exercise,” and delay things? Or did it have both impacts?

GEN. EBERHART: Sir, my belief is that it helped because of the manning, because of the focus, because the crews — they have to be airborne in 15 minutes. And that morning, because of the exercise, they were airborne in six or eight minutes. And so I believe that focus helped.

The situation that you’re referring to, I think, at most cost us 30 seconds — 30 seconds.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

These lies have been carefully crafted over years and presented in such densely-packed soundbites that it is difficult to deconstruct them all.

General Myers’ assertion that it was not NORAD but the FAA that had the responsibility to respond to the attacks that morning is one such lie. In reality, NORAD is specifically tasked with dealing with such events itself, not waiting passively for FAA orders. NORAD’s own regulations for dealing with hijacked jets specifically state that “FAA Authorization for Interceptor Operations is not used for intercept and airborne surveillance of hijacked aircraft within the [continental United States].”

And General Eberhart’s assertion that the confusion over whether the events that were unfolding were real world events or merely exercises “cost us 30 seconds” is belied by the actual audio recordings of the FAA and NORAD response that morning. Time and time again throughout the entire morning, air traffic controllers and military operators are forced to clarify that the events being reported are not part of an exercise.

08:37:52

BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.

POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?

BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

08:37:56

WATSON: What?

DOOLEY: Whoa!

WATSON: What was that?

ROUNTREE: Is that real-world?

DOOLEY: Real-world hijack.

WATSON: Cool!

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

08:42:59

NASYPANY: Fourteen forty three, look for it, right there, ok, mode three, fourteen forty three, last known. No, this is real world. Ok, we’re in the high chair.

SOURCE: Rutgers Law Review

08:43:06

FOX: I’ve never seen so much real-world stuff happen during an exercise.

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

08:57:11

NASYPANY: Think we put the exercise on the hold. What do you think? [Laughter.]

SOURCE: DRM1_DAT2_Channel2_MCC_Op [TRANSCRIPT]

This persistent confusion over the reality of what was happening that day is hardly surprising. Although the exact details are still shrouded under a cloud of official secrecy, on the morning of 9/11 NORAD was in the middle of a week-long war game that “coincidentally” included simulated hijackings of passenger jets.

“Vigilant Guardian” is an annual command post exercise involving all levels of NORAD command. Vigilant Guardian 01 was a week-long war game described as a “simulated air war,” and, just two days before 9/11, it had involved a simulated terrorist hijacking of a civilian passenger jet by terrorists intending to blow the plane up with explosives over New York City. Even more remarkably, on the very morning of September 11th, they were planning to simulate another passenger jet hijacking just one hour after the attacks began to unfold.

In 2006, Vanity Fair reporter Michael Bronner was the first journalist given access to the tapes of NORAD operations that morning. In his subsequent article on the subject, “9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,” Bronner talked to Lieutenant Colonel Kevin Nasypany, the mission-crew commander on the “ops” floor at the Northeast Air Defense Sector on the morning of 9/11.

“When they told me there was a hijack, my first reaction was ‘Somebody started the exercise early,'” Nasypany later told me. The day’s exercise was designed to run a range of scenarios, including a “traditional” simulated hijack in which politically motivated perpetrators commandeer an aircraft, land on a Cuba-like island, and seek asylum. “I actually said out loud, ‘The hijack’s not supposed to be for another hour,'” Nasypany recalled.

As a command post exercise, Vigilant Guardian was not conducted with real airplanes but what’s known as “sim over live,” where simulated aircraft are injected into NORAD’s air traffic system. Although the official narrative holds that the simulated injects were cleared from NORAD’s radars as soon as they appeared, thus causing no confusion, the actual NORAD tapes tell a different story.

At 9:04 AM, directly after Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower, two officers monitoring the events at NORAD’s Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) can be heard to refer to the events as potential exercise “inputs.”

09:04:50

SPEAKER 1: Is this explosion part of that that we’re lookin’ at now on TV?

SPEAKER 2: Yes.

SPEAKER 1: Jesus …

SPEAKER 2: And there’s a possible second hijack also—a United Airlines …

SPEAKER 1: Two planes?…

SPEAKER 2: Get the fuck out …

SPEAKER 1: I think this is a damn input, to be honest.

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

At 9:09 AM, one NEADS technician complains about the exercises taking place and the confusion with real world events.

BACKGROUND MALE SPEAKER: Langley’s on battle stations.

FEMALE SPEAKER: Fuck.

FEMALE SPEAKER 2: What?

BACKGROUND MALE SPEAKER: Battle stations.

FEMALE SPEAKER: Langley.

FEMALE SPEAKER: LFI.

FEMALE SPEAKER: I know. I hope they cancel the exercise, because this is ridiculous.

SOURCE: DRM1_DAT2_Channel_4_ID_Op [TRANSCRIPT]

And at 9:15 AM, an off-duty NEADS technician calls in to ask about the day’s events and the ongoing exercise.

SGT. ZUBON: You guys watching the news?

NEADS TECHNICIAN: Yeah, they’ve got it on in the battlecab right now.

ZUBON: Oh, do they?

NEADS: Yeah.

ZUBON: Yeah, I’ve been watching it for about ten minutes, and I said “I wonder if they’re—did they suspend the exercise?”

NEADS: Not at this time, no.

ZUBON: Not yet?

NEADS: But I think they’re going to. I don’t know. (Laughing).

ZUBON: Yeah, I would imagine.

NEADS: Things look pretty horrific out there.

SOURCE: 0915 Not at this time

Remarkably, at 9:30 AM, a full hour and ten minutes into the attacks, simulated aircraft were still being injected into the radar screens at NEADS. One frustrated staff member directing the response on the NEADS operations floor had to order his coworkers to “turn their sim switches off,” stopping the fake simulations from confusing the radar operators.

UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: You know what, let’s get rid of this goddamn sim. Turn your sim switches off. Let’s get rid of that crap.

SOURCE: RM1_DAT2_Channel2_MCC_Op [TRANSCRIPT]

Even worse, at the same time as these false inputs were distracting the radar operators, real military aircraft that are taking part in the live-fly exercises that day are further complicating the response to the attacks.

MALE SPEAKER: Boston Center T.M.U., yeah, we’ve got a question for you.

BACKGROUND MALE: Yes, sir.

MALE SPEAKER 1: We’re wondering if we should tell them to return to Base if they’re just on training missions, or what you guys—

BACKGROUND MALE: No, no. They’re actually on the active air per the DO out there.

BACKGROUND MALE: Is this guy launched (inaudible)?

BACKGROUND MALE: Everybody’s who’s up, you want them up?

BACKGROUND MALE: Yes, we did send the ones home that were on the training mission.

BACKGROUND MALE: OK.

BACKGROUND MALE: They are sent home.

(Simultaneous background conversations)

BACKGROUND MALE: But the Pantas are out there from Otis.

MALE SPEAKER: Right. I understand that. I’m talking about— I think there’s somebody training up in the Falcon Acts area right now.

BACKGROUND MALE: No.

BACKGROUND MALE: Falcon. Stand by. Let me—

MALE SPEAKER: Just in general anybody that’s training.

BACKGROUND MALE: Anybody in training, send them home? Missions are Falcon send them home?

BACKGROUND MALE: Right.

BACKGROUND MALE: Yeah, go ahead and send them home.

MALE SPEAKER: OK, fine.

SOURCE: RM1_DAT2_Channel2_MCC_Op [TRANSCRIPT]

Even more incredibly, false radar injects continued to show up on radar screens at NORAD’s Operations Center in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado, at 10:12 AM, a full nine minutes after the attacks had ended.

CAPT. BRIAN NAGEL: Sim…or, sorry, northeast weapons.

CAPT. TAYLOR: Hello, this is Captain Taylor calling from Cheyenne Mountain test control.

NAGEL: Yes.

TAYLOR: What we need you to do right now is to terminate all exercise inputs coming into Cheyenne Mountain.

NAGEL: Yes. Can you call 6180 extension for that, please?

TAYLOR: 6180?

NAGEL: You bet, he’ll give you that.

TAYLOR: I’ll do that.

NAGEL: OK, thank you.

SOURCE: DRM2_DAT1_Channel_20_SD2_TK.zip [TRANSCRIPT]

In the face of this overwhelming documentary evidence that the exercises taking place that morning were a persistent source of distraction that significantly complicated response efforts, the retort of the 9/11 Commission and its proponents that these false radar blips were a minor issue that “at most cost us 30 seconds” rings exceedingly hollow.

But that official story becomes even more implausible when it is learned that air traffic controllers and military personnel were not responding to four, clearly reported hijacked aircraft, as the public now imagines it, but as many as 29 potential hijackings.

MAJ. GEN. LARRY ARNOLD: We were in the process of launching aircraft all over the country during that timeframe. We had multiple aircraft called hijacked all over the country.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

GEN. MYERS: In fact, as General Arnold said, we fought many phantoms that day. […] We got many aircraft calls inbound that morning that turned out to be phantoms.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

These false reports included:

• United Airlines Flight 177, which was inexplicably reported as hijacked at 9:25 AM despite still being on the ground at Boston’s Logan International Airport.
• Delta 1989, a 767 flying from Boston to Los Angeles that was repeatedly identified as suspicious on the morning of 9/11 and ordered to land at a secure, remote area of Cleveland Hopkins Airport, where the pilot signalled “all clear” to the SWAT team outside the plane with blood running down his face.
• Continental Airlines Flight 321, which had inexplicably “squawked” the hijack code from the plane’s transponder three times before being safely brought down in Peoria.
• KAL 85, en route from Seoul, South Korea to New York, which inexplicably sent “five separate and ongoing indicators of a hijacking situation” before being intercepted by NORAD fighters over Alaska and directed to land at Whitehorse in northern Canada or be shot down.
• And literally dozens of other suspicious aircraft, inexplicable hijack indicators, false reports of planes that “never existed,” and other bizarre incidents, some of which have still never been explained to the public to this day.

But the most baffling of all of these reports involved American Airlines Flight 11, the Boeing 767 en route from Boston to Los Angeles that, according to the official government conspiracy theory, was hijacked by Mohamed Atta and flown into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.

Incredibly, air traffic controllers and military fighter jets spent much of the crucial time in the midst of the 9/11 attacks dealing with a completely false report that Flight 11 had not crashed into the World Trade Center at all, but was instead still airborne and heading towards Washington.

COLIN SCOGGINS: Scoggins, (FAA) military (operations specialist), Boston Center. I just had a report that American 11 is still in the air and it’s on its way towards — heading towards Washington.

NEADS TECHNICIAN: American 11 is still in the air—

SCOGGINS: Yes.

NEADS: —on its way towards Washington?

SCOGGINS: It was another aircraft that hit the tower. That’s the latest report we have.

NEADS: Okay.

SCOGGINS: I’m going to try to confirm an ID for you, but I would assume he’s somewhere over either New Jersey or somewhere further south.

NEADS: Okay. So American 11 isn’t a hijack at all, then, right?

SCOGGINS: No, he is a hijack.

NEADS: American 11 is a hijack?

SCOGGINS: Yes.

NEADS: And he’s going into Washington.

SCOGGINS: This could be a third aircraft.

SOURCE: NEADS Tapes: The “Phantom Flight 11 Call” on 9/11

This completely false report, phoned in by FAA military operations specialist Colin Scoggins, further confused the already overwhelmed NEADS technicians. In response, NEADS Mission Crew Commander Kevin Nasypany scrambled some of the only fighters in the entire defense sector to chase after this phantom flight.

09:21:50

NASYPANY: O.K. American Airlines is still airborne—11, the first guy. He’s heading towards Washington. O.K., I think we need to scramble Langley right now. And I’m—I’m gonna take the fighters from Otis and try to chase this guy down if I can find him.

SOURCE: Vanity Fair

So confusing was this series of events that even years later at the 9/11 Commission hearings, both commissioners and military commanders struggled to even communicate about the problem itself, let alone determine how such a false report persisted for so long.

MR. KEAN: Commissioner Gorelick.

MS. GORELICK: A couple of follow-up questions. First, for General Arnold, you testified before us before that the jets were scrambled in response to Flight 93, not American 11, and when you were asked about—

GEN. ARNOLD: I was wrong. I was wrong.

MS. GORELICK: Yeah. But—but the question about that is, and I want to be fair to you and give you an opportunity to respond, you said that the reason that you were wrong was that you hadn’t had an opportunity to listen to the tapes, or the tapes were not accessible. But, I mean, we have—I’m just holding four of them — different headquarters and CONR logs that are—that clearly reflect that the scrambling was done in response to this phantom American 11, which didn’t exist anymore. And it was responsibility, as I recall, to do the after-action report, or to lead it, or to be in part responsible for it. Did you not look at the logs in that process?

GEN. ARNOLD: Well, you refer to an after-action report that I was—that we didn’t do. I mean, I don’t recall doing an after- action report—

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Why did no one mention the false report received from FAA that Flight 11 was heading south during your initial appearance before the 9/11 Commission back in May of last year? And why was there no report to us that contrary to the statements made at the time, that there had been no notification to NORAD that Flight 77 was a hijack?

GEN. LARRY ARNOLD: Well, the first part of your question—Mr. Commissioner, first of all, I would like to say that a lot of the information that you have found out in your study of this of this 9/11, the things that happened on that day, helped us reconstruct what was going on.

And if you’re talking about the American 11, in particular, the call of American 11, is that what you are referring to?

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Yes.

GEN. ARNOLD: The American 11, that was—call after it had impacted, is that what you’re referring to?

MR. BEN-VENISTE: No. I’m talking about the fact that there was miscommunication that Flight 11 was still heading south instead of having impacted—

GEN. ARNOLD: That’s what I’m referring to. That’s correct. […]

MR. BEN-VENISTE: General, is it not a fact that the failure to call our attention to the miscommunication and the notion of a phantom Flight 11 continuing from New York City south in fact skewed the whole reporting of 9/11, it skewed the official Air Force report, which is contained in a book called “The Air War Over America,” which does not contain any information about the fact that you were following, or thinking of a continuation of Flight 11, and that you had not received notification that Flight 77 had been hijacked?

GEN. ARNOLD: Well, as I recall, first of all, I didn’t know the call signs of the airplanes when these things happened. When the call came that American 11 was possible hijacked aircraft, that aircraft just led me to come to the conclusion that there were other aircraft in the system that were a threat to the United States.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

PHILIP ZELIKOW: In their testimony, and in other public statements, NORAD officials also stated that the Langley fighters were scrambled to respond to the notifications about American 77 and/or United 93. These statements were incorrect as well. The report of American 11 heading south as the cause of the Langley scramble is reflected not just in taped conversations at NEADS, but in taped conversations in FAA centers, on chat logs compiled at NEADS, continental region headquarters, and NORAD, and in other records. Yet this response to a phantom aircraft, American 11, is not recounted in a single public timeline or statement issued by FAA or DOD. Instead, since 9/11, the scramble of the Langley fighters has been described as a response to the reported hijacking of American 77, or United 93, or some combination of the two. This inaccurate account created the appearance that the Langley scramble was a logical response to an actual hijacked aircraft.

SOURCE: September 11 Commission Hearing, June 17, 2004

False radar inputs. Military aircraft participating in exercises in the middle of a crisis. Civilian aircraft squawking false hijack reports. Fighter jets chasing phantom planes.

Which of these reports were merely the “fog of war” so often referred to by promoters of the official 9/11 story, and which were part of the exercise themselves? Were there field exercises of hijackings taking place that morning that were then mistaken for the real thing? What part did these war games and exercises play in hampering the response of the many military officers who had spent their whole careers training to protect American airspace?

Did the war games help the perpetrators of 9/11 in their attack?

The answers to these questions, like so many other questions about the events of September 11th, remain shrouded under a veil of official government secrecy.

PART FIVE: BEYOND COINCIDENCE

“Purely a coincidence.”

According to the official story of 9/11 itself, we are told that simulated hijackings were taking place at the same time as real-life hijackings. That an airplane-into-building drill was occurring at the same time as airplanes were flying into buildings. That false radar blips and fake hijack reports were competing for the military’s attention with real-world radar blips and hijack reports. And throughout it all, technicians, operators, military personnel and air traffic controllers were constantly seeking reassurance that what they were seeing was not part of an exercise.

Purely a coincidence? Or part of a pre-meditated plan?

And if this unprecedented tangle of exercises, drills and simulations was part of a pre-meditated plan, what was that plan? What would be the point of simulating the attacks even as the attacks themselves were taking place?

MICHAEL RUPPERT: For me, the pivotal evidence absolutely demonstrating direct government complicity in and management of the attacks was found in a number of undisputed yet virtually unaddressed war games that I have shown were being conducted, coordinated, and/or controlled by Vice President Dick Cheney or his immediate staff on the morning of September the 11th.

The names of those wargames are known to include: Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian, Northern Vigilance, and Tripod. There is a possibility that Northern Guardian is a duplicate name, but the remaining exercises are indisputably separate events with different objectives. All have been reported by major press organizations relying on undisputed quotes from participating military and FAA personnel. They have also been confirmed by NORAD press releases. All, except for Northern Vigilance and Tripod II, had to do with hijacked airliners inside the continental United States, specifically within the northeast air defense sector or NEADS, where all four 9/11 hijackings occurred.

According to a clear record, some of these exercises involve commercial airline hijackings. In some cases, false blips or “injects” were deliberately inserted into FAA and military radar screens, and they were present during at least the first attacks. This effectively paralyzed fighter response because with only eight fighters available in the region, there were as many as 22 possible hijackings taking place.

Other exercises, specifically Northern Vigilance, had pulled significant fighter resources away from the northeast US just before 9/11 into northern Canada and Alaska. In addition, a close reading of key news stories published in the spring of 2004 revealed for the first time that some of these drills were live-fly exercises, where actual aircraft—likely flown by remote control—were simulating the behavior of hijacked airliners in real life. All of this as the real attacks began.

The fact that these exercises have never been systematically and thoroughly explored in the mainstream press or publicly by Congress—or at least publicly in any detail whatsoever by this so-called “independent” 911 Commission—made me think that they might be the holy grail of 9/11. And that’s exactly what they turned out to be.

Only one war game exercise, Vigilant Guardian, was mentioned in a footnote to the Kean Commission report, and then it was deliberately mislabeled as an exercise intended to intercept Russian bombers instead of a hijack exercise in the northeast sector. Even then a deliberate lie was told to the American people as NORAD commander General Ralph Eberhart testified to the Commission that the exercise actually expedited US Air Force response during the attacks.

Before the Commission’s final hearing I undertook a direct investigation in an attempt to learn more details about each of the exercises and specifically who was controlling them or had planned them to take place on September the 11th, where it’s abundantly clear based upon the record of statements made by the US Air Force and FAA personnel that the games had effectively paralyzed fighter response during the attacks.

SOURCE: 9/11 Omission Hearings – Michael Ruppert On Dick Cheney – 9/9/2004

The exercises taking place on 9/11 could only be to the benefit of the attackers. No stand down order would have kept any dedicated fighter pilot worth his salt grounded during the only attack on his country’s air space in his lifetime. But if those fighter pilots and their commanders had no idea what was real and what was fake, what was an actual threat and what was just a phantom blip, then their response could be effectively contained.

And it was. The utter “failure” of the air response that morning is proof of that.

But if the simulations and war games on the morning of 9/11 were part of a pre-meditated plan on the part of the attackers, then the obvious question is who were the attackers? Are we to believe that the dastardly Al Qaeda masterminds not only perpetrated the simultaneous hijacking of four civilian airliners, turning off the plane’s transponders and putting them through a series of maneuvers that even advanced pilots could not replicate to hit their targets with pinpoint accuracy, but also penetrated the command structure of the US military and NORAD itself to direct the planning and scheduling of simultaneous war games mirroring their own plot to confuse the air response to the attacks?

Because if that sounds like an outlandish comic book fantasy, then there is only one other possible conclusion: That members of the National Command Authority, the US military and NORAD in a position to plan and schedule such exercises were the attackers themselves.

BYERS: What is scenario 12-D?

(BYERS SNR doesn’t respond.)

BYERS: We know it’s a war game scenario. That it has to do with airline counter-terrorism. Why is it important enough to kill for.

BYERS SNR: Because it’s no longer a game.

BYERS: But if some terrorist group wants to act out this scenario, then why target you for assassination?

BYERS SNR: Depends on who your terrorists are.

BYERS: The men who conceived of it the first place. You’re saying our government is planning to commit a terrorist act against a domestic airline?

BYERS SNR: There you go again. Blaming the entire government as usual. In fact, a small faction …

BYERS: For what possible gain?

BYERS SNR: The Cold War’s over, John. But with no clear enemy to stockpile against, the arms market’s flat. But bring down a fully loaded 727 into the middle of New York City and you’ll find a dozen tinpot dictators all over the world just clamoring to take responsibility, and begging to be smart-bombed.

But that’s “just fiction” and the fact that it all happened in real life a few months later is just another “pure coincidence.”

The truth of what happened that morning would be remarkably easy to come to if those involved in the planning and execution of the day’s training events were to open the records and allow independent examination of the precise situations that were being trained that day, how those scenarios were arrived at, who planned them, who was in charge of them, what radar injects and false reports and live-fly simulations were taking place, how these exercise inputs were relayed to technicians and air traffic controllers, and what steps were taken at what times to allow those events to continue even as the attacks they were supposed to be simulating were actually happening in real life.

But we shouldn’t expect the guilty parties to indict themselves, and so it is no surprise at all that the official government investigation into 9/11 studiously avoided facing any of these issues head on.

VOICE FROM AUDIENCE: Ask about the war games that were planned for 9-11.

MR. KEAN: Commissioner Gorelick.

MS. GORELICK: Um.

VOICE FROM AUDIENCE: Tell us about the 9-11 war games.

MS. GORELICK: Could you please be quiet, we only have a few minutes with General Myers, and I would like to ask a question.

VOICE FROM AUDIENCE: Tell us about the war games.

MS. GORELICK: I’m sorry.

MR. KEAN: I would ask please for the people in the audience to be quiet if you want to stay here.

SOURCE: 9/11 Commission hearing June 17, 2004

So what does it mean when a simulation of a catastrophic and catalyzing event takes place at the exact same place and time as that event is happening in real life?

This is one of the many crucial questions of 9/11 that have been swept under the rug over the past 17 years. It is not a rhetorical question, but a very real question with a very real answer. And until that question is answered, we will never find justice for the victims of 9/11 or of those of 10/7/2023. Hope, springs eternal!

Declaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707.

Rockefeller uses a capitalism's revenue stream principle. Social control, engineered to increase profits in health care and later insurance. The Insurance industry designed the Obama Health Care Bill. It works for insurance companies and Rockefeller Medicine system.

This completed the Rockefeller medicine capitalist's exploitation of the citizenry in both industries. This is why health care in the USA is the most expensive in the world and insurance cost steadily rise.

This elaborate concept was to gather and fund scientist, doctors and academics in colleges and universities that would adopt these new views. Only the immense wealth of this family and others could have amassed such a fraternity. Hospitals and clinics are incentivize to adopt this new system. They began to reject any homeopathic treatments or remedies. This new system used accreditation's, certifications and licensing to monopolize the industry.

Allopathic, was to be opposite of homeopathic. Historically relied on homeopathic cures were inexpensive. No tried and true capitalist could make enough profit. Profits on this new medicine needed to increase. The cost of these new radical surgeries, treatments, therapies and drugs had to reap huge profits.

Rather than accept the good in homeopathy, used for generations. Rockefeller medicine refuses to allow homeopathy treatments, drugs and supplements that showed promising results.

Rockefeller's monopoly even encouraged the use of fossil fuels in the production of new medicines. Allopathic or modern medical schools have only recently added more study and information on how food and nutrition can help prevent and treat disease.

It's about time, Western Medicine or Rockefeller medicine accepts all alternative medicines and treatments that show promise. Over capitalized drugs and treatments, costing a small fortune is Rockefeller Medicine.

Change the focus to inexpensive medical results that work. Embrace healthy alternatives and save money. Many can be found on this website. Rockefeller Medicine produces poor outcomes when compared to alternative medicines.

Audio Podcast:Video Podcast:

Disclaimer: Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707

Helps them to profit from the ravishes of population growth, pollution and climate crisis. Their world banks create a need in others to borrow money. How much borrowing has the climate crisis caused? Wars are paid for by government borrowing. Every disaster is followed by vast amounts borrowing. They control the funding for Geo-engineering, earth altering experiments.

Who are the wealthiest? They have no need of most of us. The planet population would be far more sustainable at three or four billion, instead of 8 billion. As long as you survive, you're okay. Whether one dies from their weapons of war, lab made viruses, drugs or from a rigged heath care systems. One's still dead. 5G is silent killer. Autism in the youngest and cancer from the low- frequency modulations emitted.

The first family is quickly approaching a quadtrillion dollars. We never hear about them, because they rather we didn't know. Family wealth is best kept secret. Let Elon Musk take center stage as the richest man in the world with wealth in the mere billions. How can they not control and manipulate currencies, commodities and the price of gold.

When they possess the lion's share. It's natural that they will do the same with Bitcoin. Buy a majority share then pull out suddenly. Collapse the market. You can't bring us those crypto markets unless, we are in charge. We'll crush any opposition to the almighty dollar.

Control World News

Hundreds of their media outlets are with the (CFR) Council on Foreign Relations. Imagine being free from this propaganda and misinformation. We can always hope that one day. We will be free to think for ourselves. Find solutions to population growth, avert war and pestilence.

One family has enslaved the rest world. Most are unaware of this enslavement and that's what wealth can do. Family wealth kept secret influences us all. Their donations influence politicians. Support their causes cost as little as $1000.00 to many millions. Bribery is cheap for them because they only have to print more money. They are the world banks and they hold most of the wealth in the world about 80%.

What if our one family rulers, capitalize on ending individual liberty, freedom and democracy? Making us slaves, in essence? Remember Julian Assange told the truth and look where he is today.

Family wealth kept secret is the key to understanding how the world works. Chaos and calamity creates wealth. Climate change disasters have filled their coiffures. They have indebted people and governments of the world by creating conflicts, climate change and pestilence. Brilliant wealth building strategies for this one family and their world banks.

Read more.

Here is a podcast explanation.

So many species have vanished in such a short time. How tightly is the control, from our rulers. Why must we fight back too such limits? Just, to get their attention. Being super glued to anything is a self sacrifice, in a non-violent way to advance progress. Extinction Rebellion is an admirable cause. Can our rulers ever be persuaded to come to the table?

The principles and values are noble and have merit. The vision, mission and that flag logo are very effective. The hour glass is empty, I wonder what my neighbors will say when I fly one. Could it kill a real estate deal? Is there harassment in store for me? I guess I’ll never know, until it flies.

People create a protest to convince their rulers we need a change. Rulers who are not sympathetic about climate crisis or species extinction are psychopaths and sociopaths. They're perfectly happy to keep these policies the way they are. It is not going to be easy to change their minds. They got to feel it financially one way or the other because they know no empathy.

They control most of media sources through the Council on Foreign Relations. How far will their omissions or demonizing go?  Their propaganda narratives become many of our perceptions. Like who's Juan Guaido? He declared he was acting president of Venezuela. When these narratives are back by wealth they can make us believe almost anything. Propaganda and censorship working together can keep us from knowing the truth. The truth gets camouflaged and hard to find. Extinction Rebellion never gives up the search.

When looking for the truth, find sources that have no hidden agendas or motivations.  Check out who their principles supporters are and this will say a lot. Sponsors who engage in selling weapons of war slant their facts or narrative towards creating confrontations. Like when NATO and USA kept poking the bear and the bear attacks Ukraine because of NATO expansion. This is a serious example of how the truth can create harmful fallout.

Russia proved that it could be has cruel as the USA was in Iraq. Both have shown a good reason to start a war, is not necessary. The UN is inadequate because there are no repercussions when the charter is violated.  So these violations go on.  When you have veto power you have absolute immunity.  This rule is a mockery of justice causing suffering for many.

Wars such as these only hold back are ability to face the climate crisis and species extinction.  They only make matters worse for all humanity.  Such as premature deaths, migration, poverty, force displacement, loss jobs, mass destruction, collapse of economies and devaluations of currencies.  

For banks and weapon manufactures it is their bread and butter how they create more wealth.  Their greed drives soldiers to their graves and rips food from the mouths of growing babies. War is good for nothing. Extinction Rebellion and peace is the answer.

For more visit: https://rebellion.earth/

Disclaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707.

• Employment (right to work) food, clothing and leisure with enough income to support them.
• Farmers rights to a fair income
• Freedom from unfair competition and monopolies
• Housing
• Medical care
• Social security
• Education

This Second Bill of Rights unfulfilled to this day. Who used Polygal on FDR? A drug discovered in 1943 used by Nazi’s to cause strokes in the victims is how FDR's human rights Bill, dies. The world's overlords altered history that day in a most profound way.

This is what people wanted most, why many died. Imagine how the country and the world would have done after the war ended with these human rights. The world waited for President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to in act this bill Second Bill of Rights into law. Overlords had different ideas and they changed the course of history.

What was the real cause of death? Was it just a sudden stroke or a crime? Hasn’t it been an unfulfilled promise to our allies and the rest of the world? We gather the evidence and make the case. Who has committed similar assassinations on these other occasions, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy. It does show a pattern. Each time they have altered history and have covered it up. The people deserve reparations.

 Hold these overlords to account for the damages from these assassinations and delay in implementation of the Second Bill of Rights. This is an effort toward peace and restorative justice for the people of the USA and the world.  Often we have to look back to move forward.

 As FDR said, all of these rights spell security. And, after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these Second Bill of Rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being. America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens. For unless, there is security here at home, there cannot be lasting peace in the world.

Had we adopted these promised rights Second Bill of Rights the small miracles they would have brought would have transformed the world for the betterment of all.

Disclaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707

Coronavirus, QinetiQ and the Rothschild Bombshell:

 The Rothschild’s family owns 80% of the entire world’s wealth. How long before they have the other 20% left to us. Look how hard they worked and how fast they got the first 80% of the entire world’s wealth. We are on track to 100 percent total human servitude soon.

 With vast wealth comes much influence. One could say they are our overlord family.  The world is in their hands.  We have a world that they have molded for us. Over the centuries, calamities have occurred with frequency. Are they because of one family’s wealth?

This surely explains history. Realistically, nothing is going to change these dynamic in our lifetimes. As long as pandemics, war and pestilence create wealth we are destine.

Is it the glory of the royal scam? It is business as usual for these two entities. They have absolute immunity regardless of the projects they choose to entertain. It makes sense; those with the most to gain, bankers would have something to do with it. How has the wealthiest done, since the discovery? The power of 56 countries in the British Commonwealth nations plus the Rothschild's more than 700 trillion dollars in assets preCovid reserves. It is the ruling fortune of the universe.

Some were at the ready with vaccines and some weren’t. Some got some and some didn’t. Who profits, the pharmaceutical industry, and the banks? Those that wheel the wealth and power could have pull this off. They are the wealthiest and most powerful pair in the world. A release of the coronavirus created vast wealth. How does one profit from both sides of war or a pandemic by providing financing for governments, businesses and consumers.

They control the media with the Council on Foreign Relations and global security with alliances everywhere. The pandemic created much wealth for those in banking and producers of vaccines as countries scurry for financing to cope.

When you combine the wealth of the Rothschild family and influence of the Royal Crown of the Commonwealth of the UK the chances are endless. With their loyal following of nations around the world it is an ideal way to distribute a virus discretely.

This virus has sophisticated markers that rules out the corona virus origins coming from any species. The world is coming to realize. This virus certainly was manufacture in a lab with the purpose of reducing the population for the elderly, diabetics, those with low immunity and who are overweight.

Social Security agencies around the world have benefited from this population reduction as those previous pensioners die.  One in five of those who have contracted the corona virus have Long Covid a version of the virus with many more aliments unknown to the medical community.

This outbreak overtime will boost the medical communities and pharmaceutical industry’s profits. This is the ideal engineered virus for creating big profits for the medical industry. The WHO likes it for the publicity and the influence it brings. If this was just another wealth producing scheme, I wonder how many came before it. Was the Spanish Flu, Polio or AIDS created in these same laboratories? What's next for us in their search for even more wealth?

Slide Show

The Queen’s company the Pirbright Institute holds U.S. Patent No. 10,130,701 on CORONAVIRUS. Pirbright tracks back to SERCO Group Plc and QinetiQ Group Plc, which both have contracts with the U.S. Patent Office. Outrageously, SERCO essentially runs the U.S. Patent Office (under the Commerce Department) patent application process!

This “inequitable conduct” in patent legal terms is fraud and invalidates the claim while the world fights this British-American Pilgrims Society-inspired emerging pandemic, in our opinion. See THE PIRBRIGHT INSTITUTE, Co. No. 00559784. (Jan. 07, 1956). Certificate of Incorporation and related records. Companies House (UK).

Queen Elizabeth II is the long-time Patron of the British-American Pilgrims Society (1902-present). Sir Henry Solomon Wellcome pharma-propagandist-spy was a Pilgrims secret founding member along with Winston Churchill, propagandist John Buchan & the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail’s Lords Burnham and Northcliffe. See The Pilgrims Society of Great Britain, United States, Profile Books, London (2002,2003) (Jan. 2002, p.1: “As Patron of the Pilgrims it has given me great pleasure to support the unique contribution which the Society has made to Anglo-American relations over the years.” (Source)

CORONAVIRUS UNCOVERS ROTHSCHILD LORD PIRBRIGHT AS KEY TO THE 140-YR. PILGRIMS SOCIETY MONOPOLY OVER WORLD CULTURE, COMMERCE & WAR

The British Crown and the C.I.A. teamed up treasonously via QinetiQ Group Plc controlled by the Monarch.

Lord Pirbright (Rothschild) and his banker cousins at N.M. Rothschild & Co. were godfathers of the 2nd Boer War concentration camps (1899-1902) to drive the French, Dutch and Germans out of South Africa.

New Evidence: Leading London Jews were running the first modern war concentration camps where over 60,000 whites and blacks died, including more than 14,000 mostly white children who were subjected to Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (now Wellcome Trust–Coronavirus funder and GlaxoSmithKline) vaccine experiments.

These Privy Council and Parliamentary records have been discovered after much difficulty and missing documents. (Source)

**********************  Sources  ***********************

• Video:  Douglas Gabriel Interviews researcher, Michael McKibben
• Coronavirus, QinetiQ, and the Rothschild Bombshell
• CORONAVIRUS TRACED TO THE BRITISH CROWN
• CORONAVIRUS UNCOVERS ROTHSCHILD LORD PIRBRIGHT AS KEY TO THE 140-YR. PILGRIMS SOCIETY MONOPOLY OVER WORLD CULTURE, COMMERCE & WAR

Reference:

https://justrichest.com/rothschild-family-net-worth/

**********************  End  ***********************

Disclaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707.

Every year, millions of tons of plastic enter the oceans, of which the majority spills out from rivers. Is way we need the largest cleanup in history. A portion of this plastic travels to ocean garbage patches, getting caught in a vortex of circulating currents. If no action is taken, the plastic will increasingly impact our ecosystems, health, and economies.

WE DEVELOP ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES TO RID THE OCEANS OF PLASTIC

Solving it requires a combination of closing the source and cleaning up what has already accumulated in the ocean and doesn’t go away by itself it needs the largest cleanup.

• CLEANING OceansThe Ocean Cleanup is developing a passive cleanup method, which uses the natural oceanic forces to rapidly and cost-effectively clean up the plastic already in the oceans. With a full fleet of cleanup systems in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, we aim to clean up 50% of its plastic every five years.LEARN MORE
• INTERCEPTING IN RIVERS
• The Ocean Cleanup has developed the first scalable solution to efficiently intercept plastic in rivers before it reaches the oceans. By placing Interceptors in 1000 strategic locations in rivers around the world, we aim to halt 80% of plastic from entering the oceans in five years’ time closing the source and cleaning up.LEARN MORE

Go to the original post: https://theoceancleanup.com/

Disclaimer: Podcasts are voluntarily shown on a limited time only for determining its award winning value. Voice broadcasting objections by mail to Wisdomvision LLC Box 3707 Stateline, NV 89449-3707

Day Shelters supplement homeless and low-income people when the shelter their staying in only offers shelter on an overnight basis. Case management is often provided and sometimes there are laundry and shower facilities. Meals and basic hygiene may also be offered.  Almost all day shelters provide their services free of charge. Any emergency or homeless shelter that allows clients to stay during the day is also classified under this category.

Emergency Homeless Shelters both provide short term relief for the homeless and low-income. Usually there is a maximum stay of 3 months or less.  Many of these shelters ask their clients to leave during the day. Meals and other supportive services are often offered. 3 times out of 5 these shelters offer their services free of charge.

Halfway Housing helps transition individuals and families from shelters or homelessness to permanent housing.  Length of stay is usually anywhere from 6 months to 2 years.  Residents are often required to pay at least 30% of their income toward program fees.  Sometimes the money they pay in fees is returned to them when they leave. Any emergency or homeless shelter that allows their clients to stay more then 6 months is also classified under this category.

Permanent Affordable Housing is a long-term solution for housing.  Residents are often allowed to stay as long as they remain in the low income housing bracket but is sometimes limited 3 - 5 years.  Residents pay no more than 30% of their income toward rent. Emergency shelters, homeless shelters and transitional housing programs that allow their clients to stay without a maximum stay is also classified under this category.

Drug And Alcohol Rehab programs are intended to treat alcohol and/or drug dependency.  The cost of participating in one of these programs and the method of treatment range significantly. The database operated on this website only includes residential rehab programs (not outpatient programs). We also find and list Access To Recovery (ATR) Grant programs for substance abuse treatment. 

Financial Help For the Needy If you are needy and looking for financial help, check out FinancialHelpResources.com.

Supportive Housing Programs that provide an alternative living arrangement for individuals who, because of age, disability, substance abuse, mental illness, chronic homelessness or other circumstances, are unable to live independently without care, supervision and/or support to help them in the activities of daily living; or who need access to case management, housing support, vocational, employment and other services to transition to independent living.

Shared Housing Programs helps bring low income persons together and helps prevent homelessness by providing affordable housing options. This service is good for families, disabled persons, and others wanted more companionship. Shelterlistings.org finds these shared housing locations and lists them throughout our website. This is also housing for low income.

Transitional housing is affordable supportive housing designed to provide housing and appropriate support services to persons who are homeless or who are close to homelessness. The transition is to help them be more self sufficient to move toward independent living on their own. Services provided at transitional housing facilities varies from substance abuse treatment, to psychological assistance, job training, domestic violence assistance, etc. The assistance provided varies, but it is generally affordable]]> false no 0:00 No no https://wisdomvision.com/earthbag-tornado-shelter/ Sun, 05 Apr 2020 13:11:05 +0000 https://wisdomvision.com/?p=3830 Posted on May 3, 2012 by Owen Geiger

Ride out the storm! Save thousands of dollars by building your own earthbag dome tornado shelter. (See link below for free plans.)

Designing an earthbag tornado shelter has been on my to-do list for years. My intent was to modify my free plans at Instructables.com (see below). Yesterday I came across the following article at Yahoo and found out concrete tornado shelters are costing thousands of dollars. So I decided to write this blog post to summarize how to make your own storm shelter out of earthbags (sandbags), local soil, gravel, barbed wire, and plaster. The dome shown above cost about $300 a few years ago. A smaller dome used only for emergencies could probably be built for half that cost if you eliminate the buttresses, the living roof (earth and plants on top) and are clever in making a door out of salvaged materials.

From Yahoo:“Safe rooms feature thick steel walls and doors that can withstand winds up to 250 mph. They are typically windowless, with no light fixtures and no electricity — just a small, reinforced place to ride out the storm. Costs generally range from $3,500 to $6,000.Sizes vary, but most hold only a few people. They can be bolted to the floor of a garage or custom-fitted to squeeze into a small space, even a closet. Some are so small occupants have to crawl inside. A few are buried in the yard like the old storm shelters of the late 1800s and early 1900s.Before the twister devastated Joplin, the Neosho, Mo., safe room manufacturer called Twister Safe had four employees. Now it has 20.“Business has probably quadrupled, at least,” owner Enos Davis said. “We’re selling 400 to 500 a year now, compared to maybe 100 before.”Missouri’s choice spotlights a debate in states seeking better tornado protection: Is disaster aid better spent on safe rooms in individual homes or on larger public shelters designed to protect hundreds or thousands of people?The downside of public shelters is getting there. Even with improvements in twister prediction, venturing out into a rapidly brewing storm is perilous.“I wouldn’t get my family into a car and run that risk,” Joplin Assistant City Manager Sam Anselm said. “If you have the opportunity to put something in your house, that’s what we would encourage folks to do.””Source: Yahoo

Build your own tornado shelter with free earthbag dome plans at Instructables.com — How to Build an Earthbag Dome. This earthbag dome Instructable will be featured in an upcoming book due out this fall along with other ‘best of” Instructables. You can read the original article in its entirety at Mother Earth News Magazine. The dome is 8’ in diameter and makes a great tool shed. You might want to build a smaller version for use as a tornado shelter. It’s easy to adjust the dome size by shortening or lengthening the string-lines used to create the radiuses.

Suggestions for reducing cost and labor: build no larger than needed (5’-6’ diameter might suffice for a storm shelter); build a sturdy steel door (an opening about 2’x3’ or 30” diameter would suffice); plaster the dome instead of using earth on top; eliminate the buttresses (not needed if the dome is tiny and there’s no living roof). Questions? Leave a comment below and I’ll be happy to respond.

Disclaimer: Podcast]]> false no 0:00 No no https://wisdomvision.com/natural-remedies/ Thu, 02 Jul 2020 00:04:09 +0000 https://wisdomvision.com/?p=3836 Discover the Top Best Natural Remedies from Around the World to Heal and Nourish the Body